Dear Joss,
I hate you. I hate you, you pompous arrogant douchebag. You want the MPAA to take away Captivity's rating (Check out the story at this site)? You call it "torture porn." Let me tell you, sir, you are no man to judge what is "torture porn." Season Six of Buffy is what I would classify as "torture porn." You take one of your character (who, at the beginning of Season Six, was one of your most "female" characters), degenerate him into a helpless sexual pawn who is willing to be used again and again, and let him be beaten nearly to a bloody pulp in an alleyway trying to save the woman he loved from making the biggest mistake of her life. You let him be sexually assaulted TWICE ("Smashed" and "Gone") and verbally abused by almost every other character. THEN, you decide that since your main character is losing popularity and you want to garner sympathy for her, you make her the ultimate victim, almost raped by the other character who has steadily become more popular than every other character on the show. I don't care if you didn't make the call, sir. You should have known what was going on on your own fucking show. I'm not gonna fanwank Seeing Red; Spike tried to rape Buffy, pure and simple. Now, I can still sympathesize with him; I see him as going through some sort of twisted battered wife syndrome, finally lashing out at his abuser. Would it have killed Buffy to really apologize for the things she did to him? And, no, I'm sorry, being almost raped doesn't take away her accountability for the things she was doing to him. Sure, the "Hey, that's cheating!" line in "Gone" was cute until it was clear that Buffy was committing an act of forcible sodomy on him when he obviously wanted her gone (and so did I...guess the title of the ep was appropriate to that extent). Yeah, it's really feminist to take away a man's self-esteem and use him just because you hate yourself. That's GRRL POWER! Don't give me that "She was in a dark place!" bullshit; it's such a cop-out. In the real world, you are still accountable for your actions even when you've been emotionally scarred.

Making Spike Buffy's bitch and letting James be harrassed by both crew members and other actors isn't cool. I don't know what kind of freak show you were running, but in no other studio have I ever heard of such rampant sexual harrassment of an actor; I suppose because he was male he just supposed to tough it out, right? Pornography actors and actresses get treated with more respect by their directors than that! And scaring him into towing the party line by threats of firing him is so totally wrong I don't even know where to begin! It obviously is something that is still bothering him. Honestly, it bothers me a hell of a lot, and I wasn't the one naked for eight hours a day. That, dear Mr. Whedon, is why you have no right to judge what is "torture porn." You also have no right to take away someone freedom of speech. If the MPAA takes away their rating, it means that most theatres will refuse to show the film; that's censorship. The rating system should be done away with all together in my opinion, along with labeling music, but I digress. I saw the trailers for Captivity, and they look no worse than Saw or Hostel. Maybe because a female lead is the one caught in a scary place and is being mentally tortured when Saw and Hostel had more male characters in those situations is the reason it bothers you, since you are oh so feminist! The guy in the trailers for Captivity looks like he's getting the brunt of the torture, so shut your cakehole. Many things in the world have been called the antithesis of mankind, so stop acting like you're the God of What Is Politically Correct. The Sex Pistols for starters, who I like, and they are a hell of a lot more creative than you or this film seems to be. This movie I may see; I may not. I may not go see it, I may not like it, I may hate it with a fiery burning passion, but by God, I will defend its right to be shown in theatres. If the MPAA has already given it a rating, you shouldn't ask them to take it away. Yes, money talks, Mr. Whedon, and since that's the only language _you_ understand, let me spell it out for you. You complaining about how violent and demeaning it is is only going to cause this film to make twice at the box office what it would have. So, you fail!
No love, you asshat.
Sincerely,
Fender
Woman, feminist, ranting bitca, and unapologetically all of these.

From: [identity profile] bubonicplague.livejournal.com


Oh, wow, a good Whedon rant does make me happier than a cheesecake orgasm.

*applauds*

From: [identity profile] fenderlove.livejournal.com


Aww, thank you. That's been bottling up inside me since I read his little letter to the MPAA. *gags* God, the man gives me such powerfully bad headaches. Makes me wish I could go back in time, tie him up, fire Marti Noxon (and make her attend a support group for men who actually have been sexually assaulted so she wouldn't take things such as that so lightly), and take over writing Season Six and Seven myself. *headdesk*
Thanks for reading! XD

From: [identity profile] bubonicplague.livejournal.com


Seriously, I think it's far less harmful to indulge in creating what he calls "torture porn" - which is basically just slasher film cotton candy (no one takes any life lessons out of that shit) - than to deliberately attempt to destroy your viewers by making them identify with the characters before having those characters commit horrid atrocities that are likely to leave those viewers emotional messes.

I saw the Nightmare on Elm Street films when I was about eight. No harm done. I was bothered for years about Whedon turning my favorite character into a rapist, as an attempted rape victim. Joss can bite my chalky ass.

From: [identity profile] fenderlove.livejournal.com


Same here. I can watch the Nightmare on Elm Street, Friday the 13th, Halloween, Texas Chainsaw Massacre, and Hellraiser series with no problem. Seeing Red I cannot watch. It physically makes me ill. Not only is it a duex ex machina (or however you spell it) and totally unneccessary, the whole episode logistically doesn't make sense. She couldn't fight off Spike who she has proven again and again that she's stronger than because she had a bruise on her back, but an hour later she's fighting uber-Warren with little difficulty? Sure, he wasn't being easily beaten but she wasn't getting hurt either. That makes no sense at all! Plus, Spike as a rapist never made any sense to me because he's too loyal to the women he's with. I mean, he never cheated on Harmony, and he could have. Rape was Angelus' bag. It stinks of retcon. Even though Marti has tried to put this whole "Spike was abused turned abuser" spin on things, it just makes it worse. "Abused turning abuser" happens in children, not adults usually. Spike being sexually assaulted then sexually assaulting someone would make more sense if he were an underaged boy, not a grown man. Now, Spike killing Buffy would have made a little more sense if one wants to go with the "battered spouse" thing. The whole things a mess; plus, throw in the fact that Spike is supposed to be drunk during the whole thing and suddenly you've got an anti-alcohol message too! Kill me now, please.

From: [identity profile] bubonicplague.livejournal.com


Hahahaha yes. Joss' hypocrisy in this situation is a bit overwhelming, isn't it? Plus I despise that whole "I am always for free speech - well, except when it comes to this" stance.

From: [identity profile] fenderlove.livejournal.com


I remember there was this "Things You Really Hate" thread or communtiy or something. I posted to it, talking about how, while BTVS is my favourite show, I hated how it was considered a feminist show. My Women's Studies prof has ghost written several of the more "scholarly" Buffy books so I ran up to her and asked if she would mind talking about the show and its "issues" with feminism. She agreed and was surprised by all the "rape talk." She said she didn't remember anything like that in the show. I said, "It was in Season Six." To which, she replied, "Oh, I stopped watching the show in Season Three." I was like OMG! I can't believe she would proclaim to be such a knowledgable person about the show and not have watched the last three seasons! I actually got her to watch the rest of the show (I loaned her my DVDs). She was very shocked. Though she did say this, "Seeing Red made me think of The Pack. Xander was never held accountable for his attempted sexual assault of Buffy because he claimed not to remember. It is played off as a joke that he didn't want them to know he remembered what he did." I couldn't agree more. She agreed with me about the whole, "If you're a sexually free female, you get bitch-slapped by kharma until you can't see straight and you turn ev1L!" Why do I still like this show? I guess because it gives me something to be ranty about even three years later. XD

From: [identity profile] sockmonkeyhere.livejournal.com


Dude, if nothing else I love you for referring to Whedon as "you pompous arrogant douchebag." XD

I also love the rest of your letter, and I hope you find a way to send it to him. Or to stuff it up his pompous arrogant butt.

From: [identity profile] fenderlove.livejournal.com


Hehe, thank you. I wish I could send it to him... Maybe if I post it on Whedonesque or something. However, I really wish to be alone in a room for 5 minutes with him; preferably while he is bound and gagged and away from pointy objects. I shall have the pointy objects. XD

From: [identity profile] sockmonkeyhere.livejournal.com


*g* Unfortunately, posting it on Whedonesque will probably just get you baninated. They don't seem to allow any criticism of JW or his work there -- at least, I've never seen any posted that didn't get deleted or get the poster yelled at and punished by the mods. I don't know of any current address by which Whedon could be contacted, other than Dark Horse Comics, and I don't know if the DH staff would show him anything that wasn't complimentary. He appears to have barricaded himself from negative fan comments pretty successfully, more's the pity.

So what did your professor think of Buffy and the Scoobies by the end of the series? Did she still like them but hate that they were never made to admit to their sins, suffer consequences for their ugly behavior, apologize to their victims, etc? Or did she become so turned off that she's lost all interest in them except for a feeling of disgust?

Heh, you don't know how often I have your same fantasy of forcing the BtVS/AtS writers to listen to why I can no longer bear to watch what were once my favorite two shows. I also have a fantasy that some hugely rich person discovers the shows via DVDs and decides to finance a Spike movie (with a resurrected Fred 'cause I am selfish and they are my OTP), that Whedon gets wind of it and tells the media that he's too busy to write it right now, and that he then discovers that the rich person has already hired a new team of writers because she (in my fantasy it's a woman) doesn't want him anywhere near the project anyway.

From: [identity profile] fenderlove.livejournal.com


Joss, like Anne Rice, is so completely delusional that it's sad. Every good writer knows that you'll have some negative criticism. Hell, some of that criticism may be unfounded. However, you still have to take the good with the bad. That's life. Unfortunately, Mr. Whedon and Ms. Rice have gotten so insanely rich that they believe they can just block out everything negative and live in their own fantasy bubbles about how they are the most brilliant people in the world and everyone loves them. To quote dear Spike, "makes me want to heave."
My prof still liked them at the end, I think. I believe she was disappointed in them, but she still thought that they are capable of redemption, which I believe too 'cause if Spike and Angel are redeemable then so can everybody else. The only problem, as she told me, was that the Scoobies have become the type of people who don't have to apologize to anyone. They have become above the secular laws and above normal moral codes of conduct.
I also loaned her all the seasons of Angel because she had never seen it and because Spike's character intrigued her. And did you know that the woman sat there and watched both shows in order together? Haha! She watched BtVS S1-3, then BtVS S4 followed by ATS S1, etc. She said that she was considering writing a new book on her new perspective on the show, how, as I put it, it's a good show to watch if you don't listen to people telling you it's a feminist show, but that if you think of it as a feminist show and you know anything at all about feminism, you will hate it. I was proud 'cause she said she might use a paper I had written for her class about Spike becoming the closest thing to a feminine role model that the show ever had, and that I would get writer's credit. Whoot!

From: [identity profile] sockmonkeyhere.livejournal.com


I saw the Nightmare on Elm Street films when I was about eight. No harm done. I was bothered for years about Whedon turning my favorite character into a rapist, as an attempted rape victim.

I agree. With splatter films, you know in advance that it's going to be ridiculous and over the top and that the characters are all cartoon cutouts and it's only a matter of guessing the order in which everyone's going to die.

Whedon apparently thought it was more civilized to make the characters real and believable and endear them to the audience before splattering them.

I'm STILL so bothered, even years later, by his treatment of my beloved characters -- Spike, Fred, Tara, et al -- by what he and his crew did to them, and/or what he turned them into -- that to this day I can't watch any footage of BtVS or AtS; it literally makes me feel sick with anger and depression and disappointment.

And to add insult to injury, there's no way to contact Whedon to explain our feelings to him. I want to, even this late in the game, because IDW comics has announced that he's going to co-write an AtS Season 6 in comic book form. I shudder to think what that'll be like. I think that comic books are a poor substitute -- no substitute at all, really -- for the TV show; I want to see and hear the actors THEMSELVES, not drawings of them. But I'd like for the final semi-canon AtS story to be something that will take the ultimately horrid taste of Season 5 out of my mouth a little.

(Redeeming BtVS at this point is an exercise in futility. That Season 8 comic is absolutely retarded.)

From: [identity profile] fenderlove.livejournal.com


Did you see the Dead Things alleyway dailies that [livejournal.com profile] demoniodehiel posted on Marsters Daily? It was horrid. I had no idea that Spike was originally meant to so badly beaten. I mean, what we saw was bad enough, but to show his eye even more swollen, a visible shattered cheekbone, possibly a partially dislocated jaw, a bloody nose, and a very bloody gash on the lips is just so awful. Even though it's not considered canon, I just can't stop myself from being even more disgusted with Buffy. *wraps Spike in cotton batting and protects him forever*

From: [identity profile] sockmonkeyhere.livejournal.com


and make [Marti Noxon] attend a support group for men who actually have been sexually assaulted so she wouldn't take things such as that so lightly

In complete agreement.

From: [identity profile] fenderlove.livejournal.com


I stood there reading transcripts from the convention where she said her inspriation for having Spike attempt to rape Buffy came from her own experience trying to rape a boyfriend who had dumped her. I was so taken aback by how fearly and nonchalantly she told a huge group of people this. It made me sick. It took me three years just to tell my college friends that I had nearly been raped on a subway when I was in France in highschool. It still really bothers, but I can talk about it a little. Does she have any idea what she did psychologically to her ex by doing that to him? It's perverse. Then, she blamed the audience for not being able to see that, in the situation, Spike was the female, the abused, and Buffy was the male, the abuser. She's insane to think that the audience would see that upon first viewing (which is all a lot of people were able to stomach)! You had a male, physically larger and dressed all in black making him the focal point of a sterile white room, on top of a smaller female who is crying and begging while he rips her robe off! That's all people are going to see! It's not like Law and Order: SVU where they actually go into the stuff about a rape victim killing his/her attacker. And yes, they actually had a case where a male exotic dancer was gang raped by the rich lawyer ladies who hired him and he was thought to have killed her. They didn't go into things like that on BTVS because Buffy never had to apologize. They tried to start in Conversations with Dead People, but it was another faux-ephiphany. They never last.

From: [identity profile] fenderlove.livejournal.com


Aww, thank you!

By the way, I hate to ask, but have you seen my animation that I posted? I didn't get much of a response, and I was really looking for some feedback on it. I really hate to bother you! *hugs*

From: [identity profile] jans-intentions.livejournal.com


I usually don't watch vids or animation things, but I will take a look in the morning. Unfortunately, if you put it up today, it's been a pretty dead day. Saturdays are like that. Sundays and most weekdays are better since people are more likely to be around and see it.

From: [identity profile] fenderlove.livejournal.com


Well, I posted it first Wednesday night, I believe. Then I re-posted it for the challenge on Friday, but I noticed that it had been kind of slow. I want to thank you ahead of time for watching, really. It's a small file and quite short. ^_^

From: [identity profile] beastwith5hands.livejournal.com


why do you say buffy is commiting forced sodomy in Gone? i never got that from the episode

From: [identity profile] fenderlove.livejournal.com


He told her to leave and get out of his house, and she took his penis into her mouth without his permission when he clearly had no more interest in continuing sexual intercourse with her in that instance. That's the definition of forcible sodomy.

From: [identity profile] beastwith5hands.livejournal.com


oh i was confused. i have always thought sodomy only referred to the anus. well i guess you learn something every day.

From: [identity profile] fenderlove.livejournal.com


LOL. You just made me spew my soda. XD Yes, sodomy is any sex that is not "vagina sex." ROFL.
.

Most Popular Tags

Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags