Quandary about Spike's Chip.

[fenderlove]

When Spike was chipped, would the chip fire if he killed an animal? In S4, the Initiative fellows said that he couldn't hurt "any living thing" and there was the joke about him not being able to pick a flower (Spike says he could), but in S6, he's obviously feeding off of kittens at least a fraction of the time. Here's what I want to know- do you think that the chip would fire when he fed off of an animal? 'Cause getting a migraine just for what little blood would be in a cat doesn't seem worth it. Do you think maybe he killed them first and then drained them? Do you think that it fired but not to the point of causing him a headache? Or did the chip just not fire at all? Seems like it would be easier just to microwave bagged blood and be done with it.

Now I'm sad 'cause I'm thinking about Spike eating kittens... Poor little panda baby Siamese kittens. :(

Comments

[sueworld2003.livejournal.com]

I think despite that bit of dialog that Spikes chip was set to spare humans only. I suppose It makes sense doesn't it. The initiative wanted to created a slave army so having them unable to harm humans seems the logical thing to do.

[fenderlove.livejournal.com]

It does seem like humans are the only life that the Initiative valued, so it does make sense.