X-Posted at the Thdarkarts.

[fenderlove]

This is for the movie poster contest at thdarkarts.

Title: "Embrace of the Devil."
Movie Summary: A sequel to the 1967 horror classic, "Eye of the Devil." This film picks up five years after the previous film left off. In that time, the castle Bellenac has wasted away, vineyards milked of their last drop of wine. Whilst the pagan ritualists of Bellenac search for a solution to the dry spells, a mysterious omen points to Odile de Caray (Sharon Tate) as a worthy sacrafice in the stead of a marquis! After centuries of using her "eye of the Devil" pendant to lure the unspecting members of the de Montfaucon family to the sacrifical altar, Odile will have to make a pact with Satan to stay one step ahead of her assassins, including her twin brother, Christian (James Marsters)!

Comments

[sistercuervo.livejournal.com]

Very groovy idea. I think I vaguely remember seeing something titled "Eye of the Devil" years ago. Wasn't SHaron Tate gorgeous? It was horrible shame about her and her friends losing their lives to the Manson nuts. I loved her in "Fearless Vampire Killers".
You've got a real vintage feel with this poster, too. I love that font.

[fenderlove.livejournal.com]

Aww, thank you. Sharon and James are my muses. ^_^ The larger font is called Selfish. The smaller font is called ButterbrotPaper.

[havesomecocoa.livejournal.com]

I really like it :D I love that picture of Sharon Tate on the bottom left corner. Very lovely picture of her!

And now I leave you with some Oscar quotes! Yaynessism galore!

"We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars."
-Oscar Wilde

"Life is too important to take seriously." -Oscar

“Selfishness is not living as one wishes to live, it is asking others to live as one wishes to live. And unselfishness is letting other people's lives alone, not interfering with them. Selfishness always aims at creating around it an absolute uniformity of type. Unselfishness recognizes infinite variety of type as a delightful thing, accepts it, acquiesces in it, enjoys it. It is not selfish to think for oneself. A man who does not think for himself does not think at all. It is grossly selfish to require of one's neighbour that he should think in the same way, and hold the same opinions. Why should he? If he can think, he will probably think differently. If he cannot think, it is monstrous to require thought of any kind from him. A red rose is not selfish because it wants to be a red rose. It would be horribly selfish if it wanted all the other flowers in the garden to be both red and roses.”
~Oscar Wilde, “The Soul of Man Under Socialism”

[fenderlove.livejournal.com]

Thank you!